by @genjustlaw
In federal court, jurors don’t read the statute.
They don’t scroll U.S. Code in between witness testimony. They get instructions, carefully argued by both the Prosecution and the Defense, edited, and approved by the judge, then read aloud just before deliberations.
But on X?
Everyone’s the judge.
Everyone’s the lawyer.
And suddenly, everyone’s quoting the law wrong.
I cover trials in real time. And that means I don’t just report what was said, I break down what the jury is legally allowed to do with it. So when I posted that coercion alone may not meet the threshold for sex trafficking unless it’s tied to commercial sex, the backlash came fast. One user even tried to “correct” me with jury instructions that haven’t even been read yet.
Spoiler: They’re imagining their own version of the law. I’m just here with the receipts.
What the Jury Instruction Actually Says
Let’s be clear. The jury will receive instructions on what “coercion” means under federal law. And yes, psychological pressure can count. That’s not the debate.
But here’s the reality: the instructions aren’t public yet. They’re still being reviewed by the prosecution, the defense, and the judge line by line. Once finalized, the jury will be legally bound to follow those instructions as read, not as tweeted.
— Judge Arun Subramanian, order filed June 17, 2025
> “The Court recognizes that the parties will likely be unable to meet and confer on such redactions for the entire transcript. However, the parties should do so for the witnesses that they believe the jury will most likely ask for.”
So no, people don’t get to cite imaginary rules and claim the high ground.
This isn’t a Law & Order fan forum. It’s a real federal criminal trial.
— United States v. Park, 421 U.S. 658 (1975)
> “Jury instructions are the law of the case.”
⚖️ The Legal Line: Pressure vs Proof
The government has to prove that Diddy knowingly used coercion including emotional or psychological pressure to cause someone to engage in commercial sex. That’s the legal threshold. (18 U.S.C. § 1591).
So what does the defense do?
They don’t deny the chaos. They don’t deny the emotional manipulation.
They focus the jury on the line: Did this rise to the level of coercion that legally constitutes sex trafficking?
They don’t have to prove innocence.
They only have to raise enough doubt that the jury isn’t sure.
That’s how the law works. And that’s why nuance matters.
🔥 On X, I’m the Instruction
It’s simple : neutral coverage! But neutrality doesn’t mean soft. It means correct. And I’ll take pushback, as long as we’re all playing with the same set of rules.
People quote feelings. I quote rulings.
You call it trafficking. I ask if the legal standard is met.
You imagine instructions. I wait for the court to issue them.
The difference?
I deal in facts. You’re clinging to fantasy.
📢 Follow for More Real-Time Legal Analysis
The Diddy trial is heading into closing arguments. Jury instructions will drop. And you can bet the final verdict won’t come from X debates.
But if you want real-time, trial-accurate commentary from someone who reads the filings before the hashtags, follow @genjustlaw.
Because the jury gets instructions but X gets me.
Author
Latest entries
US2025-07-19Madeline Soto Murder — Will He Plead Guilty ? All Eyes on Stephan Sterns Ahead of Monday’s Hearing
US2025-07-19Tragedy on Crawford Pond: 17 YO Teen Arrested in Brutal Killing of Sunshine Stewart
한글 기사2025-07-19권력 설계도: 구윤철 후보자의 경제 비전과 법적 과제
South Korea2025-07-19Blueprint for Power: Koo Yoon Chul’s Economic Vision Under Legal Scrutiny
